|
Post by rudyrudyrudy on Nov 6, 2006 15:00:59 GMT
ashrocks: im my email to claire, i told her all about this site and aisleyne's strong internet fan base, in case she was not hitherto aware.
|
|
|
Post by rudyrudyrudy on Nov 6, 2006 15:02:26 GMT
premierscfc: good ferreting! what's your theory that you hope you're wrong about,btw?
|
|
|
Post by juliejuliejulie on Nov 6, 2006 15:09:25 GMT
that was odm's theory what is your theory odm? LOL
|
|
|
Post by odm on Nov 6, 2006 15:12:05 GMT
|
|
|
Post by premierscfc on Nov 6, 2006 15:29:23 GMT
Maybe Jul1an can shed some light on matters.
|
|
|
Post by secrethousemate on Nov 6, 2006 15:32:53 GMT
We are drowning in 'theories' but the only FACT is that she has switched to Little Women Management Ltd who from the data below (taken from Companies House website) have the same head office address as Big Pictures (UK) Ltd and appear to be a paper company and little else (hence the "non-trading", "dormant" references). They must be wholly owned by Big Pictures but it doesn't actually say so.
Name & Registered Office: LITTLE WOMEN MANAGEMENT LTD 25 MANCHESTER SQUARE LONDON W1U 3PY Company No. 05297771
Status: Active Date of Incorporation: 26/11/2004
Country of Origin: United Kingdom Company Type: Private Limited Company Nature of Business (SIC(03)): 7499 - Non-trading company Accounting Reference Date: 30/11 Last Accounts Made Up To: 30/11/2005 (DORMANT) Next Accounts Due: 30/09/2007 Last Return Made Up To: 26/11/2005 Next Return Due: 24/12/2006 Last Members List: 26/11/2005 Previous Names: No previous name information has been recorded over the last 20 years. Branch Details There are no branches associated with this company. Oversea Company Info There are no Oversea Details associated with this company.
|
|
|
Post by ju1ian on Nov 6, 2006 15:33:22 GMT
Maybe Jul1an can shed some light on matters. Replied to a pm from rudyrudyrudy via dsbb earlier today. Have just responded to a PM from tillybud on TA site with an update, as I've heard it. regards ju1ian
|
|
|
Post by premierscfc on Nov 6, 2006 15:37:33 GMT
Maybe Jul1an can shed some light on matters. Replied to a pm from rudyrudyrudy via dsbb earlier today. Have just responded to a PM from tillybud on TA site with an update, as I've heard it. regards ju1ian Thank you. Dashes over to have a look
|
|
|
Post by Harvestgoddess on Nov 6, 2006 15:50:56 GMT
Oh this is good news at last stupid bliddy agents letting our girl down lets hope this is just in time to get something good out of everything for her ;D
|
|
|
Post by odm on Nov 6, 2006 15:51:02 GMT
:-Xhttp://www.kenyanewsnetwork.com/artman/publish/article_124.shtml well its my own fault there as I have mentioned it and cant back out. Firstly I am beating an old tune here so I apologise profusely, but I did used to have a nagging doubt that Endermol actually hired Aisleyne to go into the house to kick up a stink. Dont ask me why I thought this, but it would not go away. Then all the following strange business with the voting and their desperation to keep things fed to the papers and have Aisleyne highlighted in all the worst ways. I basically adopted a terrible distrust of Endermol as I thought they were pulling the wool over our eyes. Plus the fact that there seems to be not a lot of info about Ais except those glamour sites etc..i.e. nothing about what the reality show in africa was etc..anyway. In general I felt that Aisleyne was paid to do the things she did, but when the nation took her to their hearts, it really was not part of the plan and Endermol panicked and in my opinion somehow the votes were fixed I thought that everytime she went in the diary room and stayed in there for ages that she was being tipped on what to do or say next or how to handle things or even more than that, how to instigate something. Well Im sorry but that is truly what ran through my head and you will want a bit of honesty even if it seems outrageous. Tv is fixed in my opinion and I believe this was. Sadly if it is true what i am saying Endermol could not control their own Pandoras box. I have been under the impression that the Agent thing was a decoy because at the end of the day the Agency Money Management does,nt seem all that active although it has been pointed out by someone that it is an old website etc. Anyway the point was that I mistook Bigger pictures for Brighter pictures. As Brighter pictures are linked to Endermol...I was beginning to think that they took Aisleyne around the long way to fool the public, back to her original Agent which I thought for a second was connected to Endermol in some odd way. Yes, completely wrong. Ok. Hands up and says sorry bout that. However, dont think my suspicions have died down as they have not. Eventually I know something will come to light and if it does,nt whoever wants to throw the first egg, I will happily climb into the stocks. ;D I do want to know though if it makes sense for a management company to be linked to Bigger Pictures? Is that a natural connection ...
|
|