|
Post by odm on Oct 25, 2006 17:55:52 GMT
Yes, thanks for the posts everyone. I never thought about whether the glamour thing was important or not as you all know I just find all sorts of photos and put them on here, whether dressed or undressed because it never really mattered to me. I did,nt know why my other half said what he did but he thinks it odd that I support a woman like Ais. He has never said anything before though but he said to me, what if I supported another bloke in the same way on a forum?? well anyway, I shall just put it all to one side. I did,nt mean that Ais was an underdog as such, but she was the one they all seemed to be SO spiteful to or find an issue with, I used the term underdog because she was also being slated constantly by others and we all know that is the case. However, I really loved Aisleynes personality and I still do, please dont read my post wrongly. I dont question what Ais does. I am an honest person though I just say what comes up and as my husband mentioned that I wondered what you all thought. There would be no point showing him anything btw...hes not the type to take any notice. I dont think theres any harm in Ais being a glamour model, she makes a very good one. I just wanted to know if my husband had a point, thats all.
|
|
|
Post by premierscfc on Oct 25, 2006 18:12:12 GMT
Yes, thanks for the posts everyone. I never thought about whether the glamour thing was important or not as you all know I just find all sorts of photos and put them on here, whether dressed or undressed because it never really mattered to me. I did,nt know why my other half said what he did but he thinks it odd that I support a woman like Ais. He has never said anything before though but he said to me, what if I supported another bloke in the same way on a forum?? well anyway, I shall just put it all to one side. I did,nt mean that Ais was an underdog as such, but she was the one they all seemed to be SO spiteful to or find an issue with, I used the term underdog because she was also being slated constantly by others and we all know that is the case. However, I really loved Aisleynes personality and I still do, please dont read my post wrongly. I dont question what Ais does. I am an honest person though I just say what comes up and as my husband mentioned that I wondered what you all thought. There would be no point showing him anything btw...hes not the type to take any notice. I dont think theres any harm in Ais being a glamour model, she makes a very good one. I just wanted to know if my husband had a point, thats all. Nothing wrong with your post. It provoked a bit of discussion and perhaps made people think back to why we like Aisleyne.
|
|
Angie
Deity
Faker 32
Posts: 768
|
Post by Angie on Oct 25, 2006 19:41:24 GMT
I just see her modelling as a job and not part of her personality which is what I fell for. My hubby thinks the modelling is a little bonus for him while I spend all my spare time on her looking for info on her. That sounds quite sexist but that is not how I meant it. I find her very sexy and to me one of the most beautiful woman ever and her personality adds to her beauty.
|
|
|
Post by odm on Oct 25, 2006 20:27:09 GMT
|
|
janie
Junior Member
Posts: 90
|
Post by janie on Oct 25, 2006 20:27:37 GMT
This really made me think, as I was having problems with her latest modelling shots. It seemed so unnecessary. But maybe she just really does enjoy it, and it's not that she feels that her body is all there is to her. I think that I can't help being concerned that there may be an element of low self esteem returning. But all your posts have really cheered me up.
|
|
|
Post by odm on Oct 25, 2006 20:37:50 GMT
This really made me think, as I was having problems with her latest modelling shots. It seemed so unnecessary. But maybe she just really does enjoy it, and it's not that she feels that her body is all there is to her. I think that I can't help being concerned that there may be an element of low self esteem returning. But all your posts have really cheered me up. ;D Thank you Janie. I think she does enjoy modelling too. I think Ais looks good and she capitalises on that. It could turn out to be a good stepping stone for her long term as she is getting out and about and recognised and obviously mixing in celebrity circles with a little higher status than before, at least, people do know her name so she is gonna get the attention. I personally am not bothered about Ais being semi nude, hopefully she will keep it under control and stay as classy as possible and meanwhile hopefully my husband who happened to look over my shoulder at the time wont think I have turned.... but also in reply back to your post, i hope too that Ais does,nt slip down the ladder as she has grown more and more nude if its classy it is good, but she must not let it go down any avenues and we k now what we mean by that dont we....
|
|
|
Post by Clash on Oct 25, 2006 20:39:37 GMT
The pictures and everything we have seen that we and even ME in particularly have plastered about the place have included some very naked glamour shots and they get more naked, like, NO CLOTHES which is one that has just come out in the Nuts mag as I have pasted on the thread mentioned above. Was she really naked in the picture you're referring to, ODM, or could her knickers have been airbrushed out? The reason I ask is that in all her modelling pictures that I've seen where she is topless, she either has her back to the camera or her hands over her chest (as she does in this one). It seems a little strange to me that she would still be covering her chest and yet apparently be perfectly happy about her nether regions being exposed. Up until now she appears to have had a rule that her nipples are always covered and her knickers stay on. I think she revealed more of her body on Big Brother than she has on her photo shoots in which, as premierscfc says, she shows less than Page 3 girls do. If, on the other hand, that is a genuine picture then I am concerned about the direction in which she may be heading.
|
|
|
Post by odm on Oct 25, 2006 20:47:28 GMT
The pictures and everything we have seen that we and even ME in particularly have plastered about the place have included some very naked glamour shots and they get more naked, like, NO CLOTHES which is one that has just come out in the Nuts mag as I have pasted on the thread mentioned above. Was she really naked in the picture you're referring to, ODM, or could her knickers have been airbrushed out? The reason I ask is that in all her modelling pictures that I've seen where she is topless, she either has her back to the camera or her hands over her chest (as she does in this one). It seems a little strange to me that she would still be covering her chest and yet apparently be perfectly happy about her nether regions being exposed. Up until now she appears to have had a rule that her nipples are always covered and her knickers stay on. I think she revealed more of her body on Big Brother than she has on her photo shoots in which, as premierscfc says, she shows less than Page 3 girls do. If, on the other hand, that is a genuine picture then I am concerned about the direction in which she may be heading. oh Clash you do have a point there i wonder if they have done that. I think i have seen a picture on one of her old modelling sights where she was naked with her back to the camera and her hand over her boobs but come to think of it could have been a waist up shot. Its odd you know, but I cant imagine Aisleyne getting tacky and somehow feel you could be right about airbrushing. I dont think I have seen anything full frontal or anything pertaining to that and because of it the impression you get of Ais is that she has got her limits. That is a good thing. The pictures of her are pretty eyepopping though but in a quite sophisticated way. Im the same as you and Janie and one or two of the others in thinking the piccies are nice, but we dont want it to go any further than that thank you...I guess that sums it up does,nt it. here is the picture in question.... it does,nt really look like ais, cos she has black lipstick or dark lipstick on and it all looks very sort of computerised rather than real if you know what I mean??? Just not very natural though it is nice ??
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Oct 25, 2006 22:01:22 GMT
To me that picture has been photo-shopped, the shape of her torso is not correct. I don't buy nuts, nor do I look for photos which may be in the like of nuts or zoo or that type of magazine, I am just not interested. I really don't mind Aisleyne doing that sort of work, but remember thats not all she does. If her agent would get her finger out, or we knew for definite what Aisleyne wants to do with her future. Maybe this is the only thing she is being offered at the moment and she has to make a living. And they are old photos and done weeks ago. I think you have to decide for yourself ODM why you are supporting Ais at the moment. However, try to remember she is not JUST a glamour model, or maybe she is?? Many people support Jordan and to my mind she is mainly a glamour model??? or something. Yet Jordan is very popular? ? with all ages. Why do I support Ais and have an interest in what she does, well she intrigued me so much whilst she was in the house I would like to see her progress and make a good career for herself. Many well known respected people have been in the likes of Playboy, It didn't make me think any less of them, or see only that side of their public persona, so I won't put blinkers on and say this is the only side to Aisleyne, not just yet at any rate.
|
|
|
Post by odm on Oct 25, 2006 22:10:57 GMT
Good points DT. I like Aisleyne for many reasons which I have spouted like a teapot now for ages..but at the moment all we have are these pics and no day to day news or conversation to grab at and discuss. The glamour pics are fine by me, as I have already stated, the point of course that was made was by my other half which set me off wondering if he had some point...however it would help if we knew exactly what direction Ais wants to go in. Its such a shame that her management are tedious because we are like flies on a windscreen at the moment ...without impact !... anyway, im sure time will make things clearer for all...
|
|